Back to search

Almond Mushroom, ABM · 2021 · Randomized Controlled Trial

Medium relevance

Attention bias modification in depression: A randomized trial using a novel, reward-based, eye-tracking approach.

Agaricus blazei

Cognition & nerves
SpeciesAlmond Mushroom, ABM
JournalJournal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry
Year2021

Key points

  • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Biased attention to negative information is a mechanism for risk and relapse in depression
  • Attentional bias modification (ABM) paradigms manipulate attention away from negative information to reduce this bias
  • ABM results have been mixed due to inconsistent methodologies and stimuli design
  • METHODS: An eye tracker manipulated stimuli in response to participants' fixations to preferentially reward attention to positive stimuli by obscuring or enhancing image quality of negative and positive stimuli, respectively
  • RESULTS: Training reduced negative attentional bias; relative to sham, active training participants focused significantly more on positive compared to negative stimuli in a free-viewing eye-tracker task (p =.038, ηp2 = 0.109) and, at trend, disengaged from sad information more quickly in a computerized task (p =.052, ηp2 = 0.096)
  • Training did not significantly affect mood in the one-week trial

From the paper

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Biased attention to negative information is a mechanism for risk and relapse in depression. Attentional bias modification (ABM) paradigms manipulate attention away from negative information to reduce this bias. ABM results have been mixed due to inconsistent methodologies and stimuli design. This randomized controlled trial used a novel approach to modifying attentional bias.

METHODS: An eye tracker manipulated stimuli in response to participants' fixations to preferentially reward attention to positive stimuli by obscuring or enhancing image quality of negative and positive stimuli, respectively. Participants with major depressive disorder completed three 35-min sessions of active (n = 20) or sham (n = 20) ABM training. Attentional bias, memory for emotional words, and mood were assessed pre- and post-training.

RESULTS: Training reduced negative attentional bias; relative to sham, active training participants focused significantly more on positive compared to negative stimuli in a free-viewing eye-tracker task (p =.038, ηp2 = 0.109) and, at trend, disengaged from sad information more quickly in a computerized task (p =.052, ηp2 = 0.096). Active training participants remembered more happy than sad words in an emotional word learning task, indicating a distal transfer of training to emotional memory (p =.036, ηp2 = 0.11). Training did not significantly affect mood in the one-week trial.

LIMITATIONS: Future studies should build on this proof-of-principle study with larger sample sizes and more intensive treatment to explore which mechanisms of training may lead to improvements in mood.

CONCLUSIONS: Attention biases in depression are modifiable through reward-based, eye-tracking training. These data suggest generalizability of training to other cognitive faculties - recall for affective information.

Citation

Woolridge SM, Harrison GW, Best MW, Bowie CR (2021). Attention bias modification in depression: A randomized trial using a novel, reward-based, eye-tracking approach. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101621 PMID: 33202263

Open citation