Back to search

Almond Mushroom, ABM · 2025 · Journal Article

Medium relevance

Preclinical Evaluation of Synthetic Bone Graft Materials in an Instrumented Sheep Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion Model.

Agaricus blazei

Immune support
SpeciesAlmond Mushroom, ABM
JournalClinical spine surgery
Year2025

Key points

  • STUDY DESIGN: This study conducted a multi-endpoint analysis of synthetic bone grafts used as standalone in a clinically relevant instrumented sheep PLF model
  • Recently, a biphasic CaP with a needle-shaped submicron surface topography has demonstrated enhanced bone-forming ability driven by its surface structure triggering a favorable biological response from the innate immune system
  • RESULTS: Radiography and µCT demonstrated superior fusion rates for BCP<µm compared with all other groups
  • Histology revealed significant graft resorption complemented by abundant bone tissue and continuous bony bridging between TPs in 3/3 implants for BCP<µm compared with only 1/3 implants for nSiCaP and 0/3 implants for ABM/P15 and BG. Histomorphometrical analysis, showed BCP<µm having the greatest new bone formation at 53±2.2%
  • CONCLUSIONS: These results show distinct differences in the performance between commercially available bone graft substitutes, highlighting the importance of utilizing clinically relevant animal models with robust, multi-endpoint analyses to evaluate their efficacy
  • Specifically, BCP<µm achieved superior fusion rates compared with other synthetic bone grafts when used standalone, further demonstrating its enhanced bone-forming ability in vivo

Metadata-grounded summary

Citation abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This study conducted a multi-endpoint analysis of synthetic bone grafts used as standalone in a clinically relevant instrumented sheep PLF model.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available synthetic bone grafts when used as standalone in a state-of-the-art instrumented sheep PLF model. The performance was measured using a comprehensive range of assessment tools.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The amount of (pre)clinical data on the quality of spinal fusions using synthetic bone grafts is limited. Recently, a biphasic CaP with a needle-shaped submicron surface topography has demonstrated enhanced bone-forming ability driven by its surface structure triggering a favorable biological response from the innate immune system.

METHODS: Six sheep underwent instrumented PLF surgery using the following bone grafts as standalone: (1) biphasic CaP with a needle-shaped submicron surface topography embedded in a collagen matrix (BCP<µm), (2) anorganic bone mineral with a synthetic peptide sequence in a hydrogel carrier (ABM/P15), (3) silicate-substituted CaP in a hydrogel carrier (nSiCaP), and (4) 45S5 Bioglass embedded in a collagen matrix (BG). After 12 weeks, spinal fusion was determined by manual palpation, radiograph and µCT imaging, range-of-motion mechanical testing, and histologic and histomorphologic evaluation.

RESULTS: Radiography and µCT demonstrated superior fusion rates for BCP<µm compared with all other groups. Histology revealed significant graft resorption complemented by abundant bone tissue and continuous bony bridging between TPs in 3/3 implants for BCP<µm compared with only 1/3 implants for nSiCaP and 0/3 implants for ABM/P15 and BG. Histomorphometrical analysis, showed BCP<µm having the greatest new bone formation at 53±2.2%.

CONCLUSIONS: These results show distinct differences in the performance between commercially available bone graft substitutes, highlighting the importance of utilizing clinically relevant animal models with robust, multi-endpoint analyses to evaluate their efficacy. Specifically, BCP<µm achieved superior fusion rates compared with other synthetic bone grafts when used standalone, further demonstrating its enhanced bone-forming ability in vivo.

Citation

Kucko NW, Barrère-de Groot F, Wills D, Wang T, Pelletier M, de Bruijn JD, et al. (2025). Preclinical Evaluation of Synthetic Bone Graft Materials in an Instrumented Sheep Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion Model. Clinical spine surgery https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001983 PMID: 41338564

Open citation